2026-VIL-479-DEL

SGST High Court Cases

GST - Export of Services vs. Intermediary Services, Refund of IGST paid on export of services – Petitioner provided education consultancy, marketing and recruitment support services to foreign universities and claimed refund of IGST paid on export of services. The respondents rejected the refund claim on the ground that the petitioner was an "intermediary" under Section 2(13) of the IGST Act, 2017 – HELD - Where an Indian entity renders educational consultancy/marketing services to foreign universities, raises invoices upon such foreign universities, and receives consideration from them, such services would not constitute intermediary services merely because students in India are incidentally assisted in the process. The determinative factor is the contractual recipient of the service, the person liable to pay consideration, and the nature of the service supplied, not the place where the incidental beneficiary may be located. In the present case, the petitioner does not charge students for its services, has no authority to bind the foreign university, cannot guarantee admission, and receives consideration from the foreign university - The issue is no longer res integra and stands covered by the judgments in Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Service Tax DGST v. Global Opportunities Private Limited and the Bombay High Court in K.C. Overseas Education Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India. The impugned order rejecting the refund claim by treating the petitioner as an intermediary cannot be sustained and set aside - The refund shall be processed and granted to the petitioner along with applicable statutory interest – The writ petition is allowed

Create Account



Log In



Forgot Password


Please Note: This facility is only for Subscribing Members.

Email this page



Feedback this page