2026-VIL-1055-DEL-CE

CENTRAL EXCISE High Court Cases

Central Excise – Rebate claim on export of goods - Adjudicating authority's obligation to consider operative orders of appellate forums when confirming demands - Although the rebate had initially been sanctioned, the Petitioner, acting upon the advice of the Department, had repaid the rebate amount along with interest. Thereafter, the petitioner continued to pay duty on the exported goods by debiting its CENVAT account and had taken credit of the duty so paid - Vide the impugned Order the Tribunal expressly held that petitioner was entitled to refund under Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules 2004 – Dept confirmed the demand without considering the CESTAT's decision despite being apprised of the same - Whether an adjudicating authority can confirm a demand based on an appellate order that has been subsequently set aside by a higher appellate Tribunal - HELD - An adjudicating authority exercising statutory powers is necessarily required to take into account operative orders of appellate authorities having appellate jurisdiction over it and cannot disregard a subsequent appellate determination which directly bears upon the very issue under adjudication. Once the Order-in-Appeal dated 16.12.2019 which had set aside the Refund Order dated 06.05.2019 was itself set aside by the CESTAT vide Final Order dated 01.08.2024, the same could not thereafter be treated as an operative determination adverse to the petitioner - The CESTAT did not merely set aside the Order-in-Appeal on a technical ground but examined the substantive entitlement and expressly held that the petitioner was entitled to refund under Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules 2004 and had specifically considered and decided the question of limitation in favour of the petitioner - The impugned order proceeds on a legal and factual premise which was no longer available. The Additional Commissioner committed a manifest error in confirming the demand without giving effect to the CESTAT's Final Order dated 01.08.2024 despite being specifically informed about it - The Order-in-Original and the Demand-cum-Show Cause Notice are set aside; The Respondent is directed to refund the amount together with applicable interest, in accordance with law – The writ petition is allowed

Create Account



Log In



Forgot Password


Please Note: This facility is only for Subscribing Members.

Email this page



Feedback this page