2026-VIL-1663-CESTAT-AHM-CE

CENTRAL EXCISE CESTAT Cases

Central Excise - Includibility of type test charges in assessable value of goods -Appellant, engaged in manufacture of ACSR Conductors, collected type test charges from a buyer for testing conducted through a third-party agency at the buyer's instance, without including the same in the assessable value for payment of central excise duty - Demand of differential duty, interest and penalty was confirmed on the ground that such charges were paid by the buyer in connection with the sale of goods and hence includible in the transaction value - Whether type test charges received by the appellant from the buyer are includible in the value of goods for charging central excise duty - HELD - Type tests on ACSR Conductors are prescribed under the applicable Indian Standard to verify design, material quality and manufacturing process, ensuring the conductor can safely withstand mechanical, thermal and electrical stress before mass production, and are mandated by the applicable standards to be conducted in certified, accredited laboratories - Such type tests undertaken as per the mandate of the standard are for ensuring safety in transmission of electricity and are thus mandatory tests, and cannot be considered optional testing - The additional amount received towards type test charges is in relation to the sale of goods, as without the requisite certificate/report the sale would not take place, and hence such amount is received in connection with sale of goods and is includible in the value of goods for payment of central excise duty - The plea of revenue neutrality is a presumption, since leviability of excise duty on excisable goods and availment of Cenvat credit are governed by separate provisions and procedural requirements - The demand of differential duty along with interest is confirmed - Quantum of penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - Equal penalty was imposed on the appellant along with confirmation of duty demand for non-inclusion of type test charges in assessable value - Whether the quantum of penalty imposed requires modification, considering that similar show cause notices for the same issue had been issued to the appellant for earlier periods - HELD - Taking a lenient view of the matter, considering that the issue in respect of the appellant is not a new one, the quantum of penalty is reduced - The duty demand along with interest is confirmed, but the penalty amount is reduced, and with this modification, the impugned order is upheld - The appeal is partly allowed

Create Account



Log In



Forgot Password


Please Note: This facility is only for Subscribing Members.

Email this page



Feedback this page