2024-VIL-1619-CESTAT-AHM-CE

CENTRAL EXCISE CESTAT Cases

Central Excise – Non-payment of duty, Invocation of Extended Period – Appellant are engaged in the manufacture and clearance of excisable goods (Cable Trays) without payment of Central Excise Duty - SCN issued proposing demands of Central Excise Duty, recovery of Cenvat Credit, and imposition of penalties. The adjudicating authority confirmed the demands and imposed penalties - Whether the extended period under Section 11A(4) of the Central Excise Act could be invoked against the appellants for non-payment of Central Excise Duty – HELD - the facts on record do not support the case of the Department for invocation of the extended period. The appellants had recorded all their business transactions, including manufacture, clearances, purchases, and sales in their books of account, which were audited under the Income Tax Act. They had also paid VAT/Sales Tax on the transactions and issued invoices to customers - Merely failing to pay Central Excise Duty due to the advice of a Chartered Accountant does not amount to suppression of facts with the intent to evade duty – Further, the Cenvat Credit was availed and reversed by the appellants in the same month, and therefore, the demand for Cenvat Credit and interest is not sustainable - since there was no intention to evade duty, the imposition of penalties under Section 11AC and Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules is not justified - the Central Excise Duty demand for the normal period of limitation along with interest is upheld the demand for the extended period, the Cenvat Credit demand, and all the penalties imposed are set aside – the appeal is partly allowed

Quick Search

/

Create Account



Log In



Forgot Password


Please Note: This facility is only for Subscribing Members.

Email this page



Feedback this page