2025-VIL-156-GAU-CE

CENTRAL EXCISE High Court Cases

Central Excise - CENVAT credit, mobile towers, prefabricated buildings, immovable property, inputs, capital goods - Appellant, a telecommunication service provider, was denied CENVAT credit on the excise duty paid for mobile towers, shelters and accessories used in providing telecom services, on the ground that these were immovable property and not eligible as capital goods or inputs under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 - Whether the mobile towers, shelters and accessories used by the appellants for providing telecom services are immovable property and thus ineligible for CENVAT credit - HELD - The mobile towers and prefabricated buildings (PFBs) used by the telecom service provider are "goods" and not immovable property. The towers and PFBs, though not electrical equipment themselves, are essential and inseparable accessories for the functioning of the antenna and transmission of telecom signals. Therefore, they qualify as "capital goods" under the CENVAT Credit Rules – In Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune, the Supreme Court observed that without the towers and PFBs, proper telecom service cannot be provided, and hence they are "inputs" used for providing the output service of mobile telecommunication, eligible for CENVAT credit under Rule 2(k)(ii) of the CENVAT Credit Rules - the orders of the CESTAT is set aside holding that Bharti Airtel is entitled to claim CENVAT credit on the excise duty paid for the mobile towers, shelters and accessories used in providing telecom services – the assessee appeal is allowed

Quick Search

/

Create Account



Log In



Forgot Password


Please Note: This facility is only for Subscribing Members.

Email this page



Feedback this page