2025-VIL-856-RAJ

VAT High Court Cases

Rajasthan VAT Act, 2003 – Sale of Branded potato chips, Penalty, Non-submission of forms VAT-10 and VAT-10A - Respondent-assessee purchased branded potato chips and sold them by collecting tax at the rate of 4%, whereas the branded chips are taxable at the rate of 12.5% - Assessing Authority imposed differential tax, penalty under Section 61 and interest. Additionally, since the assessee had not submitted form VAT-10 and VAT-10A at the relevant time, penalty was also imposed under Section 58 of the RVAT Act - Whether the imposition of penalties under Section 61 and under Section 58 of the RVAT Act are valid – HELD - The entire sale was recorded in the account books of the assessee, and there was no evidence to establish that the assessee had a deliberate intention to evade tax. Penalty cannot be imposed merely because the assessee's contention that the goods were taxable at a lower rate was not accepted by the Revenue. Something more is required to be established by the Revenue to show that the assessee had a malafide intention to evade tax and deliberately concealed the taxable turnover – Further, the summons available on record did not mention the imposition of penalty under Section 58 for non-submission of forms VAT-10 and VAT-10A, and as per Section 65 of the RVAT Act, no penalty can be imposed without affording a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the dealer. There is no perversity or ambiguity in the orders passed by the appellate authority and the Tax Board – the instant Sales Tax Revision preferred on behalf of the Revenue is dismissed

Create Account



Log In



Forgot Password


Please Note: This facility is only for Subscribing Members.

Email this page



Feedback this page