2025-VIL-1976-CESTAT-KOL-ST

SERVICE TAX CESTAT Cases

Service Tax - Bundle service, Service tax on advances - Appellant is engaged in providing maintenance and repair services. The department raised a demand for service tax on various grounds including non-payment of tax on bundle services, non-payment of tax on advances received, irregular availment of CENVAT credit, and non-payment of tax on legal services under reverse charge mechanism - Whether the appellant is liable to pay service tax on the amount received from clients towards electricity charges, gas charges, air conditioning charges etc. as part of bundle service - HELD - The appellant is not liable to pay service tax on such amounts as it was acting as a pure agent in collecting these reimbursements from the clients. The appellant submitted invoices and a CA certificate to substantiate that the reimbursements were lower than the actual amounts paid. Further, the amounts received by the appellant were in the nature of refundable loans based on the loan agreements and bank statements submitted by the appellant. No service tax is payable on such refundable loans - The disallowance of CENVAT credit to the extent which the appellant had already discharged along with interest - The demand of service tax on bundle services and advances, and the penalties are set aside. The demand of service tax on legal services under reverse charge mechanism and the disallowance of CENVAT credit to the extent already discharged by the appellant is upheld – The appeal is partly allowed

Quick Search

/

Create Account



Log In



Forgot Password


Please Note: This facility is only for Subscribing Members.

Email this page



Feedback this page