2026-VIL-78-CESTAT-CHE-CE

CENTRAL EXCISE CESTAT Cases

Central Excise – Rule 2(l) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 – Windmill related services – Eligibility of cenvat credit – Respondent is engaged in manufacture of cement and had availed CENVAT credit of service tax paid on maintenance and repair services of windmills located outside factory premises – Department issued show cause notice proposing recovery of credit along with interest and penalty – Commissioner dropped proceedings initiated against Respondent – Whether CENVAT credit of service tax paid on maintenance and repair services of windmills located outside factory premises is admissible under Rule 2(l) of the Rules – HELD – Main contention of department is that windmills are geographically located far away from factory premises and hence, services used for their maintenance cannot be considered as having nexus with manufacture of cement. Rule 2(l) of the Rules defines input service expansively and includes services used directly or indirectly in or in relation to manufacture. There is no statutory requirement under Rule 2(l) of the Rules that input service must be received within factory premises. Input service need not be used within factory premises so long as they are integrally connected with manufacturing activity. Denial of credit merely on ground of geographical distance would defeat the objective of CENVAT scheme. CENVAT credit of service tax paid on maintenance and repair of windmills located outside factory premises is admissible under Rule 2(l) of the Rules. Adjudicating authority was fully justified in dropping the proceedings. Impugned Order-in-Original is upheld – Appeal dismissed

Quick Search

/

Create Account



Log In



Forgot Password


Please Note: This facility is only for Subscribing Members.

Email this page



Feedback this page