2026-VIL-87-CESTAT-ALH-CE

CENTRAL EXCISE CESTAT Cases

Central Excise – Section 14 of Central Excise Act, 1944 – Clandestine clearance of goods – Demand of duty – Appellant is engaged in production of Unmanufactured Branded Chewing Tobacco – Investigation revealed that Appellant had manufactured goods without making entries in respect of same in their statutory records and clearing same without payment of duty – Department issued show cause notice to Appellant by proposing demand of Basic Excise Duty – Adjudicating Authority confirmed demand proposed in show cause notice – Whether demand of duty confirmed against Appellant is sustainable – HELD – Question of clandestine clearance is purely a question of fact and needs to be determined on basis of evidences recovered and marshaled in a particular proceedings. During course of enquiry made at time of search of premises of Appellant, a red diary containing details of goods manufactured and cleared by Appellant was recovered from premises of Appellant. Factum of recovery of diary had been recorded in Panchnama drawn on spot. Partner of Appellant in his statements recorded under Section 14 of the Act had admitted details found in diary and also fact of clandestine manufacture and clearance of excisable goods to various persons. Statements were given by partner of Appellant out of his own volition and there is no allegation of coercion, threat, force, duress or pressure being utilized by officers to extract the statements. Demand of duty confirmed against Appellant is sustainable. Order under challenge is sustained – Appeal dismissed

Quick Search

/

Create Account



Log In



Forgot Password


Please Note: This facility is only for Subscribing Members.

Email this page



Feedback this page