2026-VIL-306-CESTAT-KOL-CE

CENTRAL EXCISE CESTAT Cases

Central Excise - Clandestine removal of excisable goods without payment of duty - Department relied solely on these private records and statements of officers/staff of third party to raise demand against the appellant company - Whether the demand of central excise duty confirmed against the appellant company based solely on the documents recovered from the premises of a third party and the statements of its officers/staff is legally sustainable – HELD - The department relied solely on the private records seized from M/s SPRML and the statements of its officers/staff, without providing copies of these documents to the appellant. Relying on such documents without providing them to the appellant violates the principles of natural justice - The department failed to conduct a proper investigation to substantiate the allegation of clandestine removal, such as evidence of excess raw material purchase, actual removal of unaccounted goods, receipt of sale proceeds, etc. Mere reliance on private records of a third party is not sufficient to prove clandestine removal – Further, the appellants had requested cross-examination of the persons whose statements were relied upon by the department, but this request was denied by the adjudicating authority without valid reasons. Denial of cross-examination, when the entire case is based on such statements, violates the principles of natural justice - The demand of duty, interest, and penalties confirmed against the appellant is set aside and appeal is allowed

Quick Search

/

Create Account



Log In



Forgot Password


Please Note: This facility is only for Subscribing Members.

Email this page



Feedback this page