2026-VIL-396-RAJ

SGST High Court Cases

GST - Bail application - Arrest in connection with a case registered for offences under Sections 132(1)(a),(f),(h),(l) of the CGST Act, 2017. The allegations against the petitioner are that he was part of a larger conspiracy involving clandestine supply of marble and granite across the country without payment of GST, resulting in tax evasion of tax - Whether the petitioner is entitled to be enlarged on bail considering the nature and gravity of the offence, the magnitude of the alleged evasion, and the material available on record – HELD - The case involves an economic offence arising out of a structured and deep-rooted conspiracy, resulting in significant loss to the public exchequer. The economic offences constitute a class apart and need to be viewed with a different approach while considering the prayer for bail. The provisions of Section 480(6) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) do not confer an absolute or indefeasible right upon the petitioner to be released on bail, as the Magistrate retains the authority to deny bail taking into consideration the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case - The contention with regard to the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, in the facts and circumstances of the present case, by itself cannot be treated as a determinative or sole factor for grant of bail, as mere length of incarceration, in absence of any other mitigating circumstances, does not entitle the petitioner to be enlarged on bail, more particularly when the allegations pertain to a serious economic offence involving substantial loss to the public exchequer - The Bail application is dismissed

Quick Search

/

Create Account



Log In



Forgot Password


Please Note: This facility is only for Subscribing Members.

Email this page



Feedback this page