2026-VIL-1321-CESTAT-KOL-ST

SERVICE TAX CESTAT Cases

Service Tax - Eligibility of Cenvat Credit taken on basis of supplementary invoice issued by service provider for prior periods when service tax was not originally charged - Service provider had not discharged service tax liability from earlier years and issued supplementary invoice in 2016 for prior years and paid service tax with interest and penalty on self-disclosure, appellant took Cenvat Credit on basis of supplementary invoice - Department denied Cenvat Credit invoking Rule 9(1)(bb) of Cenvat Credit Rules 2004 claiming service provider had suppressed facts - Whether Cenvat Credit is barred under Rule 9(1)(bb) when no show cause notice and demand has been confirmed against service provider - HELD - Cenvat Credit on supplementary invoices is admissible when condition precedent of Rule 9(1)(bb) is not satisfied. Rule 9(1)(bb) provides embargo on taking Cenvat Credit only where additional amount of tax has become recoverable from service provider on account of fraud, collusion, willful misstatement or suppression. Recoverable demand requires that demand of service tax must be confirmed after show cause notice is issued and no appeal is pending - In present case no SCN was issued against service provider let alone existence of recoverable demand. Revenue has not made out any case for denial of Cenvat Credit. Supplementary invoices issued by service provider in prescribed form under Service Tax Rules are valid documents for taking Cenvat Credit - In absence of show cause notice and determination that additional amount has become recoverable, tax amounts paid by service provider cannot be denied on ground that Rule 9(1)(bb) is attracted. Demand confirmed against appellant is set aside and the appeal is allowed

Quick Search

/

Create Account



Log In



Forgot Password


Please Note: This facility is only for Subscribing Members.

Email this page



Feedback this page