2026-VIL-1500-CESTAT-MUM-ST

SERVICE TAX CESTAT Cases

Service Tax - Refund claim for service tax on export services - Relevant date for determining limitation - Appellant filed refund claims for service tax and cess paid on input services used in providing services exported under Rule 6A of Service Tax Rules - Refund claims pertained to period July 2012 to September 2013 and were filed on 21.01.2014 and 02.04.2014 - Revenue rejected refund claims as time-barred contending that Notification 14/2016-CE dated 01.03.2016 providing clarification on relevant date has only prospective effect and not retrospective - Whether relevant date for claiming refund in case of export services is date of receipt of foreign exchange and whether refund claims filed were within prescribed time limit - HELD - For refund of service tax on input services used in export services the relevant date is the date of receipt of foreign exchange as quoted by FIRC and not the date of issue of invoice. This position has been held by Tribunal in cases of Bechtel India Pvt. Ltd. and Scionspire Consulting Services - Rule 6(3A) of Service Tax Rules stipulates that export is completed only on date of receipt of foreign exchange. The Notification 14/2016-CE is clarificatory in nature stating what is apparent to remove doubts and does not represent a change in substantive law but merely clarifies pre-existing legal position. The refund claims filed within period from relevant date i.e. date of receipt of FIRC are within prescribed time limit under Section 11B read with Notification 39/2012-ST - Since refund claims are filed within time limit from relevant date they are not barred by limitation - The impugned order is upheld and appeal of Revenue is dismissed

Quick Search

/

Create Account



Log In



Forgot Password


Please Note: This facility is only for Subscribing Members.

Email this page



Feedback this page