2026-VIL-1532-CESTAT-CHE-ST

SERVICE TAX CESTAT Cases

Service Tax - Adjustment of excess Service Tax Paid - Succeeding Month or Quarter - Rule 6(4A) of Service Tax Rules - Appellant availed CENVAT credit on service tax paid under Reverse Charge Mechanism on services received from foreign service providers and had made advance tax payments which were utilized against its liability in succeeding years - Department disallowed the adjustment contending that under Rule 6(4A) of the Service Tax Rules such adjustments of excess payment could be made only during the immediate succeeding month or quarter - Whether the adjustment of excess advance service tax paid could be made to a subsequent month or quarter beyond the immediate succeeding month or quarter under Rule 6(4A) of Service Tax Rules – HELD - The Rule 6(4A) does not contain the word immediate and the plain reading of the Rule allows an assessee to adjust the excess amount paid against service tax liability for the succeeding month or quarter. If adjustment could be made only in the immediate succeeding month or quarter, a situation would arise where an assessee has no service tax liability in that immediate period or excess paid is higher than the immediate period's liability making the Rule provision impractical. The Rule intends an assessee to adjust excess payment to liability accrued later thereby avoiding hassles of refund claims and since the excess amount is already in the hands of the Revenue there is no revenue loss in such adjustment and the Revenue is enriched by the interest on the excess amount till adjustment - The adjustment of excess service tax can be made not only in subsequent month or quarter but also in subsequent months or quarters - The impugned order is set aside and the appeals are allowed

Quick Search

/

Create Account



Log In



Forgot Password


Please Note: This facility is only for Subscribing Members.

Email this page



Feedback this page