2026-VIL-1562-CESTAT-MUM-CE

CENTRAL EXCISE CESTAT Cases

Central Excise - Penalty for receipt of goods without duty – Liability of distributors to verify payment of excise duty – Appellant trader purchased goods from manufacturer who had cleared goods without payment of central excise duty while claiming exemption under relevant notification. Appellant as distributor sold the goods to ultimate buyers - Show Cause Notice alleged that appellant abetted evasion of duty and proposed penalty under Rule 26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002. Appellant submitted that as mere distributor of goods from manufacturer - Whether a distributor can be held liable for penalty when goods have been cleared without payment of duty by the manufacturer and the distributor is unaware of non-payment of duty at the factory gate - HELD - A distributor who purchases goods from the manufacturer is not under legal obligation to verify payment of duty at the manufacturer's end and cannot be held liable for violation committed by the manufacturer. The liability for payment of central excise duty lies exclusively with the manufacturer and not with the buyer - A mere suspicion based on adjustment of rent and business relationship does not establish that the distributor had knowledge of non-payment of duty at the time of acquisition of goods. The legal principle clearly dictates that the buyer can never be said to have violated any provision of law merely because the manufacturer did not discharge duty liability - The order imposing penalty on the distributors is set aside and the appeal is allowed

Quick Search

/

Create Account



Log In



Forgot Password


Please Note: This facility is only for Subscribing Members.

Email this page



Feedback this page