2026-VIL-848-DEL

SGST High Court Cases

GST - Maintainability of Writ Petition despite availability of statutory appeal remedy - Demand on basis of unaccounted transactions discovered during search at third party premises - Whether extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of Constitution can be invoked notwithstanding availability of efficacious statutory remedy under Section 107 of CGST Act - HELD - Although statutory appellate remedy under Section 107 is available, High Court may entertain writ petition in exceptional circumstances where there is breach of fundamental rights, violation of principles of natural justice, excess of jurisdiction, or challenge to vires of statute. However, petitioner has not made out case falling within recognised exceptions - Petitioner's authorised representative appeared during adjudication proceedings, participated in hearing, and filed detailed written reply which was considered by adjudicating authority – The alleged defects in service of hearing notices, once petitioner had participated and placed defence, do not constitute patent violation of natural justice. Issues relating to evidentiary foundation, admissibility of electronic data allegedly recovered from third party premises, authenticity of forensic examination report etc. are matters pertaining to correctness of adjudication and appreciation of evidence which fall squarely within exclusive domain of statutory appellate mechanism and do not warrant invocation of extraordinary writ jurisdiction - Writ petition dismissed with liberty to avail statutory remedy of appeal under the Act – The petition is dismissed

Quick Search

/

Create Account



Log In



Forgot Password


Please Note: This facility is only for Subscribing Members.

Email this page



Feedback this page