2026-VIL-907-PAT

SGST High Court Cases

GST - Refund of Excess Input Tax Credit - Withholding of refund during pendency of appeal - Procedure prescribed under Section 54(11) of CGST Act, 2017 - Petitioner applied for refund of accumulated balance in Electronic Cash Ledger - Whether respondent authorities can withhold refund during pendency of appeal before Tribunal without passing a specific order under Section 54(11) of CGST Act - HELD – The Section 54(11) CGST Act mandates that the Commissioner can withhold refund during pendency of appeal only if he is of opinion that grant of refund is likely to adversely affect revenue. Such withholding must be done through a specific order passed after giving the taxable person proper opportunity of hearing. The Deficiency Memo issued under Rule 90(3) CGST Rules is merely a communication for rectification of deficiencies in application and cannot per se operate as withholding of refund without compliance with Section 54(11) - In the present case, no proceeding or exercise was taken by Commissioner under Section 54(11) warranting withholding of the refund amount. The respondent-authorities cannot withhold refund merely on the ground of filing revision application before Tribunal without following the procedure mandated under Section 54(11) - Writ application is disposed with direction to Commissioner to issue fresh Show Cause Notice within one week affording petitioner opportunity to file reply within one week thereafter and to pass reasoned order after hearing petitioner within one month from closure of hearing – Ordered accordingly

Quick Search

/

Create Account



Log In



Forgot Password


Please Note: This facility is only for Subscribing Members.

Email this page



Feedback this page