2026-VIL-266-GSTAT-CTT

SGST Tribunal

GST – Filing of return and payment of tax after enforcement action, Invocation of Section 74 for delayed filing of returns - Determination of tax by reason of fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts – Appellant-Department contended that filing returns and paying tax only after enforcement action establishes suppression and intent to evade - Whether Section 74 can be invoked on the ground of delayed filing of returns and payment of tax after inspection - HELD - Section 74 can be invoked only where tax is not paid by reason of fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts with intent to evade tax, and these ingredients must be brought on record. Under Explanation 2, suppression means non-declaration of facts or information required to be declared in the return, statement, report or document furnished, so a case of suppression arises only after the filing of returns and only if material information is not declared - The turnover and liability declared in the returns were accepted, which negates mis-statement and suppression. The statutory scheme of Section 39, notice under Section 46 and best judgement assessment was not followed, and inspection was preferred instead. The deposit of the estimated cash liability before the inspection and the payment of interest before commencement of proceedings indicate compliant conduct, subject to verification of payment records - Mere failure to file monthly returns in time, without evidence of the statutory ingredients, cannot sustain invocation of Section 74 - The order of the FAA is upheld to the extent it holds that Section 74 is not legally invocable against the Respondent - The matter is remanded to the original adjudicating authority for determination of liability, if any, under Section 73, subject to the statutory limit - The appeal is disposed of

Create Account



Log In



Forgot Password


Please Note: This facility is only for Subscribing Members.

Email this page



Feedback this page