2025-VIL-1700-CESTAT-HYD-ST

SERVICE TAX CESTAT Cases

Service Tax - Cenvat Credit of CVD paid on import of 'Self Propelled Trailer Suction Hopper Dredger, Capital Goods – Disallowance of CENVAT credit on the ground that the dredger is not covered under the definition of 'inputs' or 'capital goods' in the CCR, 2004 - Whether the imported dredger can be considered as 'input' for the purpose of providing output service i.e. dredging service or it has to be treated as 'capital good' despite it not being explicitly covered within the definition of 'capital goods' under Rule 2(a) of the CCR, 2004 - HELD – The dredger, though not explicitly covered under the definition of 'capital goods' in Rule 2(a) of the CCR, has to be considered as an 'input' under Rule 2(k)(iv) as it is used for providing the output service of dredging. The definition of 'capital goods' in Rule 2(a) is restrictive and does not cover all possible capital goods, and the expression "unless the context otherwise requires" in the definitions allows for a broader interpretation considering the context. Further, the definition of 'capital goods' under a different statute cannot be relied upon to interpret the term under the CCR, as the CCR has its own definitions - The mere fact that the dredger is capitalized in the books of account and claimed for depreciation under the Income Tax Act does not preclude it from being considered as an 'input' under the CCR. Accordingly, the order disallowing the CENVAT credit claimed by the appellant is set aside and the appeal is allowed

Quick Search

/

Create Account



Log In



Forgot Password


Please Note: This facility is only for Subscribing Members.

Email this page



Feedback this page