2026-VIL-670-CESTAT-AHM-CU

CUSTOMS CESTAT Cases

Customs - Classification of imported goods between "condensate" and "light oil" - The imported goods were initially classified as "condensate" under Tariff Heading 27101990 by the Customs authorities, but later the Department sought to re-classify them as "light oil" under Tariff Heading 27101190 after investigation by DRI - The SCN proposed demand of differential duty jointly and severally from the importers/buyers – HELD - The department failed to discharge the burden of proving that the initial classification of the goods as "condensate" under Tariff Heading 27101990 was incorrect. The samples were not drawn in accordance with the prescribed procedures, and the test reports relied upon by the department did not conclusively establish that the goods were "light oil" classifiable under Tariff Heading 27101190 - The burden to prove the correct classification is on the department, which has not been discharged satisfactorily. Neither the test report of Kandla CRCL showing 90% distillation at 208°C nor the Intertek report showing 90% distillation at 216°C meets the criteria laid down by the Supreme Court in Krishna Technochem P. Ltd. case that 90% or more distillation should be "at" 210°C, and not merely "up to" 210°C. The initial classification by the customs authorities as "condensate" under Tariff Heading 27101990 is therefore upheld. Further, the department's case is weakened by the fact that there was revenue neutrality as the higher CVD paid would have been eligible for credit - The initial classification of the goods as "condensate" under Tariff Heading 27101990 is upheld and the appeal is allowed

Quick Search

/

Create Account



Log In



Forgot Password


Please Note: This facility is only for Subscribing Members.

Email this page



Feedback this page