2026-VIL-539-CESTAT-ALH-CU

CUSTOMS CESTAT Cases

Customs - Extra supply to compensate for damages during transport, Mis-declaration of quantity and value of imported goods - Appellant imported consignment of Computer Cabinet Cases and on examination, goods were found in excess of the declared quantity. The revenue authorities rejected the declared value and re-fixed the value based on the report of a Chartered Engineer, who opined that the goods were old and used, and were incomplete desktops - Whether the appellant has mis-declared the quantity and value of the imported goods – HELD - The excess quantity of 111 pieces out of 4,320 pieces is an insignificantly small number. The clarification provided by the foreign supplier that the extra pieces were supplied to compensate for any damages during transport is reasonable. Thus, there is no mis-declaration of quantity with the intent to evade payment of duty - Regarding the issue of mis-declaration of value, the Chartered Engineer's opinion on the value of the goods was casual and unsupported by any evidence. The revenue also did not prove that the importer paid the foreign supplier in excess of the price shown in the invoices. Therefore, the re-determination of the value by the revenue is not warranted - The Tribunal also disagreed with the classification of the goods as incomplete computer systems, as the Chartered Engineer had used the terms "Computer Cabinet Cases" and "barebone systems" interchangeably. Without a Central Processing Unit (CPU), the system cannot be considered an incomplete or unfinished computer system. Merely a computer cabinet case for a computer system without CPU cannot be held to an incomplete or unfinished computer system - The impugned order is set aside and the appeal is allowed

Quick Search

/

Create Account



Log In



Forgot Password


Please Note: This facility is only for Subscribing Members.

Email this page



Feedback this page