2026-VIL-595-CESTAT-DEL-CE

CENTRAL EXCISE CESTAT Cases

Central Excise - Duty liability on goods manufactured by contract manufacturer on job work basis, finished goods cleared without undertaking any manufacturing activity - Appellant entered into an agreement with job-worker for manufacture of car seat sets on contract manufacturing/job-work basis. The raw materials were provided by the appellant to the contract manufacturer, who was availing the area-based exemption. The finished goods were cleared to the appellant, who sold the same to automobile manufacturer without undertaking any manufacturing activity - SCN proposing to recover excise duty from the appellant on the ground that as the principal manufacturer, it was liable to pay the excise duty on the goods manufactured by the contract manufacturer - Whether the appellant is liable to pay excise duty on the goods manufactured by the contract manufacturer on job work basis - HELD - Various decisions of the Supreme Court and the Tribunal have laid down the principle that the job worker who has undertaken the manufacturing activity is the "manufacturer" and is liable to pay the excise duty. As per the agreement between the parties, the relationship was that of independent contractors and the manufacturing activity took place at the premises of the contract manufacturer by employing its own resources, labour and machinery, without any control and supervision of the appellant. Applying the ratio of the law laid down by the Apex Court, the contract manufacturer is the "manufacturer" of the goods and is liable to pay the excise duty - The appellant cannot be said to be the manufacturer of the goods and it is the contract manufacturer, who is the manufacturer of the goods and, therefore, liable to pay the excise duty - The impugned order is set aside and the appeal is allowed

Quick Search

/

Create Account



Log In



Forgot Password


Please Note: This facility is only for Subscribing Members.

Email this page



Feedback this page