2026-VIL-385-CESTAT-CHE-CE
  1. Home
  2. 2026-VIL-385-CESTAT-CHE-CE

CENTRAL EXCISE CESTAT Cases

Central Excise - Valuation of captively consumed goods, allowability of certain expenses in computation of cost of production - Appellant removed goods on payment of duty on stock transfer basis to their sister units for further use in the manufacture of textiles machinery -Department alleged that the appellant had failed to correctly assess the value of goods cleared on stock transfer basis and pay the appropriate duty thereon - Whether expenses pertaining to manufacturing of other items and administrative overheads can be excluded from the cost of production of the captively consumed goods - HELD - The expenses pertaining to manufacturing of other items and administrative overheads are not required to be included in the cost of production as per CAS-4 and the demand under these heads was set aside. The Tribunal relied on its own previous order in the appellant's own case where similar expenses were held to be not includible - The demand under this head cannot sustain and set aside - The impugned order is set aside and the appeal is allowed on the ground of limitation. The issue of R&D expenses is remanded for fresh adjudication - Whether the research and development expenses incurred towards development of a new product can be included in the cost of production of the captively consumed goods - HELD - The appellant had claimed that the R&D expenses were incurred towards development of a new product 'HL insert assembly' and not towards development or improvement of the existing products. The issue requires de novo adjudication as the adjudicating authority had not properly examined the appellant's claim and had made assumptions without any evidence - Whether the invocation of extended period of limitation is justified - HELD - The Department was aware of the method of valuation adopted by the appellant for inter-unit transfers since 2008 and had not objected to the same. The Tribunal held that this would not amount to 'suppression' of any material facts with 'intent' to evade duty, and hence the invocation of extended period of limitation is not sustainable in law.
Download File
show more Judgements  

Quick Search

/

Advance Search

GST Resources

/

Gst Rate Finder

Tax Vista

Your Weekly Tax Recap

By Kasi Viswanathan V

Weekly Summary

VIL Video

Analysis of Union Budget 2026-27:
By CA Vivek Jalan

Create Account

Security-Code
New Code?

Log In

New User ? Forgot Password ?

Forgot Password

Security-Code
New Code?
Please Note: This facility is only for Subscribing Members.

Email this page

Feedback this page

Schedule a Demo

Schedule a demo to know the features and advantages of VILGST portal. Get to know the tips to find the desired results in faster way.

Caselaw Request Form (CRF)

Didn’t find what you are searching for? No worries, please give us the following details and VIL will email you the desired Caselaws at the earliest:

Security-Code
New Code?